From "mess with the birds, get the beak" to "mess with the birds, and you're totally fine if it was an accident; we are all friends here." Migratory bird protections are changing again, and it's just as exciting as it sounds.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is proposing to adopt a regulation that will codify the 2017 Solicitor's Opinion M-37050, which redefined what activities are illegal under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Specifically, the proposed regulation will decriminalize accidental migratory bird death or harm that may occur due to otherwise lawful activity.
2020: The Proposed Rule
The proposed regulation will codify the M Opinion. The M Opinion is only a legal guideline, and the next administration could easily overturn it. Codifying the M Opinion into regulation makes it much harder for a future president to issue a reversal.
As with all of the environmental regulations that President Trump seeks to overhaul, lawsuits abound. Several conservation groups and a handful of states have sued to block the M Opinion, and we will certainly see more legal action opposing this latest rule. In the meantime, USFWS is accepting public comments on the rule through March and, after addressing comments, will release a final rule later this summer or fall (presumably before November 2020).
To limit impacts to projects, it’s best to practice proper environmental due diligence and use an endangered species map or other tools. The only thing worse than flying blind on a project site is that thinly veiled attempt at a bird/ flying pun we just did there. We can move past it if you can.
Background on the MBTA
The MBTA, passed in 1918, made it illegal to take or kill any listed migratory bird species without a valid permit from the federal government. Historically, enforcement of the MBTA focused on hunters, trappers, and others who directly assaulted birds. But beginning in the 1970s, USFWS widened its net and began to prosecute businesses that "incidentally" (i.e., accidentally) killed these protected birds, such as wind farms, power lines, oil pits, etc.
Additional Federal Regulations
These bird populations may be subject to protection via federal regulations such as the Endangered Species Act (ESA) or the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. With new rules, developers have increased environmental permitting requirements to follow. We are sure you're aware of how happy they were about that and how well that went over. Spoiler Alert: everyone has disagreed over bird protections since the 70s, and it's been super frustrating. All squawk, no solutions.
2017: The M Opinion
President Trump ran on a platform of reducing the environmental permitting burden on business. The Trump administration made its first change to the MBTA in December 2017 when Solicitor's Opinion M-37050 ("M Opinion") was published, which stated that businesses accidentally killing migratory birds during their normal operations did NOT violate the MBTA. This opinion was a dramatic reversal of the existing interpretation of the MBTA, and it reversed Obama-era MBTA guidelines that have broadened the government's reach under the MBTA.
UPDATE: MigratoryBird Protections
On October 4, 2021, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service reinstated the prohibition of incidental take of migratory birds. This change is just the latest example of regulatory recall under the Biden administration and yet another contrast of protections between presidential administrations. The broadening of the MTBA’s scope of protection will be a crucial tool in migratory bird conservation.